The Christian Slave Morality: Christianity as Psychological Warfare and the Domestication of Western Man
By Ralph Perrier
A Book in Two Volumes
“Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to turn a man against his father, a daughter against her mother…” – Matthew 10:34-36
“Do you think I came to bring peace on earth? No, I tell you, but division…” – Luke 12:51
“Fascism, I think, was the most radical revolutionary movement that Europe has seen since the age of Constantine. Because unlike the French Revolution, unlike the Russian Revolution, it doesn’t even target institutional Christianity: it targets the moral/ethical fundamentals of Christianity. The French Revolution, the Russian Revolution are still preaching the idea that the victim should be raised up from the dust and that the oppressor should be humbled into the dust; it’s still preaching the idea that the first should be last and the last should be first just as Christ has done. The Nazis do not buy into that. The Nazis buy into the Nietzschean idea that the weak are weak and should be treated as weak, as contemptible, as something to be crushed…. Atheists of today [like Richard Dawkins et al]… they are basically Christians. Nietzsche saw humanists, communists, liberals—people who may define themselves against Christianity—as being absolutely in the fundamentals Christian, and I think he is right about that because I think that in a sense atheism doesn’t repudiate the kind of ethics and the morals and the values of Christianity.” - Tom Holland
Preface
Introduction
VOLUME I: THE CHRISTIAN PSYOP
Part 1: The Theoretical Framework
1 Foundations of Christian Slave Morality and Nietzschean Critique
2 Monotheism and Universalism as Tools of Control
3 Nietzsche’s Triad: Slave Morality, Transvaluation of Values, and Ressentiment
Part 2: Christianity as the Engine of Domestication
4 Survival of the Weakest: Inverting Natural Selection
5 Tools of Herd Domestication
VOLUME II: LEFTISM AS CHRISTIANITY’S SECULARIZED HEIR
Part 3: Secularization - Leftism as Christianity’s Heir
6 Marxist Denominations and the Frankfurt School
7 Modern Manifestations: Wokeness as Christian Heirloom
8 Judaism Vs. Christianity: What do the Jews Believe?
9 Secularization of Christianity
10 Conclusion
Addendum
Footnotes
Preface
Christianity was not a revelation but a deliberate psychological weapon—a ‘slave morality’ system engineered to domesticate populations by destroying ethnic bonds, inverting natural hierarchies, and turning the weak against the strong. It is an alien, parasitic theological software designed to overwrite the native human operating system. This program of ethnic and spiritual suicide did not end with secularization; it simply found new hosts. Marxism, Critical Theory, and the modern Woke creed are not opponents of Christianity—they are its heretical children, a secular reformation that has perfected the ancient art of mass domestication by replacing the cross with the rainbow flag and the priest with the Diversity Consultant.
Christianity culminated from centuries of scribal work by imperial elites, who built on earlier slave morality religions codified at the Alexandrian School in Egypt under Philo of Alexandria. The goal was to spread a religion to the slaves that advanced monotheism, centralized texts and priesthoods, ethos like renouncing worldly possessions, asceticism, shame and guilt, and rewards in the afterlife for earthly suffering. These imperial cults were by design slave moralities to strip the will to power from the population to prevent rebellions.
The central arguments of this book, stripped to its skeleton:
1) Christianity was not a revelation but a deliberate construction—a “slave morality” system engineered at the Alexandrian School under Philo of Alexandria, synthesizing Platonism, Zoroastrian dualism, Egyptian mythology, and Jewish messianism into a unified weapon of psychological subversion. The Alexandrian School’s fusion of Zoroastrian dualism (good vs. evil as cosmic war) with Jewish messianism produced a permanent state of psychological warfare: history becomes a battleground of absolute forces, making compromise or coexistence with the “evil” other impossible. This binary absolutism now powers woke cancel culture, where racists/capitalists/colonialists are irredeemable demons, not humans with competing interests.
2) Philo’s “Therapeutae” community in Egypt—a celibate, communal, allegory-reading sect—was the prototype for Christian monasticism. They practiced self-denial, rejected private property, and sought ecstatic union with the divine through mortification. This model was later scaled by imperial decree across Europe, turning warrior cultures into self-loathing ascetics. The Therapeutae blueprint embedded the death drive into the spiritual technology of the West, making self-extinction a holy aspiration.
3) Its purpose was domestication—to strip populations of their will to power by inverting natural hierarchies, destroying ethnic bonds, replacing ancestral pride with universal guilt, and turning the weak against the strong through a self-regulating system of moral judgment. Domestication here operates not merely as metaphor but as the literal breeding out of aggressive, proud, and independent traits from the human stock, generation by generation, through the selective punishment of the strong and the reward of the self-abnegating.
4) Its mechanism is the transvaluation of values—redefining “good” as the virtues of slaves (humility, obedience, poverty, chastity, self-denial) and “evil” as the virtues of masters (pride, strength, ambition, wealth, power, procreation). This transvaluation uses the master’s own honor code against him by making him ashamed of the very qualities that made him master.
5) It is self-policing—the slave morality system empowers the lowest castes to stand in judgment of kings, creating a society where the powerful are constantly monitored, shamed, and undermined by the weak, who derive moral superiority from their very weakness. The chandala becomes the internal thought police for the entire civilization, a ubiquitous informant network powered by resentment and sanctified by the promise of cosmic payback.
6) Secularization did not end Christianity; it perfected it—Marxism, Critical Theory, and modern Wokeness are not opponents of Christianity but its heretical children. They retain the entire moral architecture (original sin → white guilt, salvation → activism, heresy → cancel culture, universalism → globalism) while stripping away the supernatural furniture. In doing so they made the slave morality even more inescapable, because now it presents itself as rational, scientific, and inevitable rather than as faith.
7) Western man is now a domesticated animal—1,500 years of this psychological conditioning have produced a human type incapable of defending his own civilizational existence, pathologically altruistic toward outsiders, consumed by ancestral guilt, and convinced that his own extinction is moral progress. He looks upon his own demographic replacement and feels not horror but a warm glow of self-congratulatory virtue, the final triumph of a morality that has made suicide into the highest good.
A Note on Method
I follow Bruno Bauer (Marx’s teacher, the forgotten genius of 19th-century biblical criticism) in understanding Christianity as a literary product of the Alexandrian synthesis, a work of conscious mythopoesis stitched together from Greek philosophy and Jewish scripture by second-temple intellectual elites operating as imperial contractors. I follow Friedrich Nietzsche in understanding it as a psychological weapon of slave morality, the revenge of the powerless dressed in the language of love, a poison that makes the victim collaborate in his own envenomation. I follow Revilo P. Oliver in recognizing that even atheist leftists remain fundamentally Christian in their moral architecture, because the architecture is not a theology but a deeply embedded emotional operating system that persists when the theological icons are smashed.
This book synthesizes their insights into a unified theory: Christianity as Alexandrian psyop, perfected through Roman imperial adoption, secularized through Protestantism, and culminating in the Woke totalitarianism of the present.
The second volume will trace Leftism as Christianity’s secular reformation—same substance, new forms. But first, we must understand the original infection, tracing the virus from its laboratory creation through its mass deployment to its current pandemic phase where it no longer even needs the name of Christ to compel submission.
Introduction
Every single species on earth works towards the preservation and strengthening of its bloodline, from bonobos to pin oaks to jellyfish. Every single one. It is only through the domesticating forces of universal religions (Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam) that man has been able to ‘overcome’ these natural and deep biological drives and act in ways that are neutral or actually harm the reproductive success of his genes and offspring. Because of these universalizing religions, western man is an animal in the process of domestication.
As well as Christianity being a slave-morality system, Friedrich Nietzsche wrote that Liberalism is a secularized Christian political-theological religion. The Reformation coincided with the invention of the Gutenberg printing press which increased literacy and this is when a myriad of Protestant sects sprung forth: the Anabaptists, the Mennonites, the Amish, the Digger Movement, the Ranters, etc., all of whom adhered to a system of communism and preached about universalism and a utopia on earth. Marxism was one of these sects. The only difference is that Marxism was the first secularized Christian sect where the belief in a supernatural god was replaced with a belief in an omnipresent government.
The Alexandrian School under Philo Judaeus (c. 20 BCE – 50 CE) was the laboratory. Here, Greek Platonism—the Logos doctrine, the Forms, the immortal soul, the Myth of Er’s afterlife judgment—was fused with Jewish messianism and Zoroastrian dualism. The product was a theological virus: a suffering savior, a cosmic reversal of hierarchies, a deferred justice in the afterlife, and a universal brotherhood that dissolved tribal loyalty. Philo’s writings contain the Logos theology, allegorical interpretation, virgin birth prototypes, and the Therapeutic community—every essential element of Christianity before the Gospels were written. This was not anticipation; this was the blueprint. The Therapeutae were not just a fringe sect; they were a test-run for a population-control system that replaced bloodline with belief, land with liturgy, and the warrior ethos with self-mortification. The psyop became state policy. But the deeper genius was not merely top-down imposition—it was creating a bottom-up moral insurgency that pacified the population from within, making every slave a deputy of the system. The Roman legions that once conquered nations were replaced by monkish armies conquering the self.
Rome recognized the utility. Constantine’s “conversion” in 312 CE was a political merger, not a spiritual awakening. He kept Sol Invictus on his coins and delayed baptism until his deathbed. The Council of Nicaea (325 CE) standardized doctrine under imperial supervision. Theodosius I made Christianity the only legal religion in 380 CE. Pagan temples were demolished, sacred groves burned, ancestral traditions criminalized. The psyop became state policy.
Part 1: The Theoretical Framework
1 Foundations of Christian Slave Morality and Nietzschean Critique
Christianity is a sophisticated divide-and-conquer millenarianist (belief in a future utopia) (1) slave morality (2) system that is packaged as a religion. The system works by weaponizing the lowest “chandala” (3) castes as Friedrich Nietzsche called them (outcastes and untouchables in the Hindu caste system) of society to attack and overthrow the aristocratic and warrior castes (4); and secondly, the christian system contains within it a pacifist slave morality system that is designed to transvaluate a groups aristocratic and warrior values while turning these aristocratic and warrior castes into obedient and submissive slaves.
Nietzsche’s term “chandala” is deliberate. In Hindu caste hierarchy, the chandala are the untouchables—those outside the varna system, handling corpses and waste. Nietzsche saw Christianity as the “chandala religion” that took the values of society’s lowest and made them the measure of all morality. The chandala’s weakness becomes “meekness” (a virtue), his poverty becomes “blessedness,” his inability to fight becomes “turning the other cheek.” The master’s strength becomes “pride” (a deadly sin), his wealth becomes “mammon,” his power becomes “oppression.”
The system is self-policing because it makes every chandala a judge. The slave who accepts Christian morality now stands in moral judgment over his master. He cannot overthrow the master physically—the master has swords and soldiers. But he can condemn the master eternally. This gives the slave a sense of power that makes his earthly suffering bearable. He is not a victim; he is a martyr. His chains are not shame; they are a crown. This inversion makes rebellion unnecessary—why risk death for earthly freedom when cosmic justice is guaranteed?
The aristocratic and warrior castes, meanwhile, are targeted for transvaluation. Their values—pride, honor, strength, courage, loyalty to kin—are redefined as sins. The proud man is the Pharisee in the temple, condemned. The rich man is the camel trying to pass through the needle’s eye, impossible. The warrior is told to sheathe his sword: “all who draw the sword will die by the sword” (Matthew 26:52). The aristocrat who accepts Christianity must abandon his ancestral values and adopt the values of his own slaves. He must become meek, humble, charitable, forgiving. He must turn the other cheek to those he once ruled. This is domestication by moral inversion.
Nietzsche saw the historical process clearly: Rome fell not to barbarians but to the Christian virus that rotted its aristocratic virtues from within. The same virus infected the Germanic tribes that conquered Rome. Warrior kings became penitent pilgrims. Viking raiders became cathedral builders. The will to power was redirected inward as guilt, outward as crusade—always controlled, always channeled into forms the priestly caste could manage.
2 Monotheism and Universalism as Tools of Control
The shift from decentralized pagan tribalism (diverse, hierarchical polytheistic gods reflecting aristocratic values) to centralized monotheism (singular truth-claim) mirrors political consolidation. The collectivization of divine authority then reinforces a universal morality. Everything becomes collectivized with the centralization of power. This makes a group easier to control and is why monotheism mirrors autocratic governance.
Monotheism parallels the rise of autocratic states because it mirrors the consolidation of power into a single ruler, conditioning populations for top-down governance over decentralized tribal autonomy. Monotheism traces back to the slave morality of Zoroastrianism at the time when Cyrus the Great assumes total power of Persia, and in Rome as the Roman Republic turns into the Roman Empire headed by a singular dictator, Julius Caesar.
Christian universalism derives from monotheism. The universalization of a group into a singular monolith not only allows a group to become top-down controlled, but it also becomes a tool of empowerment for the oppressed through the leveling of social distinctions. Friedrich Nietzsche believed that the universalistic claims of Christianity allowed the lower classes, or “chandala”, to feel equal to the higher classes. The “all is one” doctrine incentivizes the inclusion of outcastes and when combined with an emphasis on a shared humanity and a common destiny in the afterlife this system undermines traditional social hierarchies that were traditionally based on biological kinship, intelligence, wealth, or power.
Christian universalism also led to ethnic erasure. The catholic church deliberately destroyed ethnic customs and beliefs to emphasize the universality of Christianity. Pre-Christian Europe was a patchwork of ethnicities, each with its own gods and traditions and christianity deliberately destroyed these ethnic bonds so that a religious identity replaced an ethnic identity. “Christendom” then became the first universalized identity that was built around a shared morality that transcended ethnic and cultural boundaries. “Christendom” was then replaced by the word “European” after the enlightenment, but that label still retained Christendom’s universal nature. “European” like “Christendom” is a state and political identity, as opposed to an ethnic or national identity, and the adoption of this universalist identity destroyed what little of specific ethnic European customs and traditions that were left.
3 Nietzsche’s Triad: Slave Morality, Transvaluation of Values, and Ressentiment
Friedrich Nietzsche’s concepts of slave morality, transvaluation of values, and “ressentiment” are central to understanding Christianity’s subversive power.
Slave Morality
The slave morality aspect of Christianity is designed to suppress an individual’s will to power (life’s essential drive/will to expand or grow/self overcoming). When an individual is unable to express their will to power in a constructive, outward manner, they redirect this energy inward, manifesting as self-destructive tendencies. This is what Friedrich Nietzsche called a “slave morality” where the individual’s creative and life-affirming energies are turned against themselves. As a result, in Christianity, many people’s will to power becomes directed inward, becoming satiated through masochistic self-harm. This twisted form of self-assertion can be observed in various aspects of human behavior, from the self-flagellating tendencies of Christianity to the equally destructive habits of self-sabotage and addiction. If the individual’s will to power is unable to find an external outlet it turns inward, creating a perverse cycle of self-inflicted pain and suffering.
Transvaluation of Values
Friedrich Nietzsche’s concept of the “transvaluation of values” is also central to understanding how Christianity reshaped societal norms and suppresses an individuals will to power. This theory states that traditional christian values, which emphasize humility, selflessness, guilt and pity, were created to undermine the strong. Essentially, by redefining “good” as virtues of the “chandala”, i.e., by replacing a groups aristocratic values with “chandala” values: guilt, pity, self-hate, weakness, and victimhood/oppression replace strength, pride, honor, loyalty, family, race, and tradition, etc., essentially through vilifying the powerful the lowest “chandala” castes can become the nobility. This leads to a culture that celebrates mediocrity while demonizing excellence.
Ressentiment
As for Nietzsche’s concept of “Ressentiment”, in his book ‘On the Genealogy of Morality’ (1887) he wrote that the jews (5), who he claimed are motivated by deep resentment and hatred (6), create these “slave morality” systems (7) to weaponise the “Ressentiment” of the lowest “chandala” castes (8). This is what makes the system self-policing and self-regulating. This is designed to pit the weak against the strong, with the chandala encouraged to “sacrifice” the aristocratic castes on the altar of moral superiority, as seen in historical revolutions.
Ressentiment is not ordinary resentment. Resentment is anger at a specific wrong, which can be acted upon. Ressentiment is the festering hatred of the powerless, who cannot act, who cannot fight back, who must swallow their rage and let it curdle into imaginary revenge. The slave cannot strike the master, so he fantasizes the master burning in hell. The chandala cannot overthrow the aristocrat, so he imagines the aristocrat humbled in the afterlife. This fantasy becomes the basis of a new morality—a morality that condemns everything the master is and values, and sanctifies everything the slave is and suffers.
Nietzsche’s genealogy traces this process: Jewish priests, denied political power after the Babylonian exile, created a moral system that inverted the values of their conquerors. The powerful Babylonians and Romans were “evil” because they were powerful. The powerless Jews were “good” because they were powerless. Christianity universalized this Jewish inversion and exported it to the gentile world. The slave revolt in morality was complete.
Monotheism (binary opposition between good vs. evil), universalism, the transvaluation of traditional ethnic values, and the concept of sin all exist to self-deify and weaponize the lowest castes. This allows the slaves and lower castes to feel morally and socially superior to the higher castes because of the concept of sin and set commandments of behavior. The savior complex (9) is a subset of christian self-deification and is a heritage of monotheism and messianism (10). Self-deification (11) is the foundation for attacking those that are identified as heretics (12) and redeeming others.
The Christian who condemns the sinner, the woke activist who condemns the racist, the Marxist who condemns the bourgeois—all are operating from the same psychological script: I am good because you are evil. Your power proves your evil. My powerlessness proves my goodness. I stand in judgment over you, and my judgment is God’s judgment / History’s judgment / Justice’s judgment.
This is the engine of the system. It is self-perpetuating because it offers the one thing the powerless crave more than material improvement: moral superiority. Better to be a virtuous slave than a sinful master. Better to be a holy pauper than a damned prince. The system provides meaning to suffering, dignity to degradation, purpose to powerlessness. That is why it works. That is why it persists.
(See also: Ressentiment, Conflict Theory, and Class Conflict)
Part 2: Christianity as the Engine of Domestication
4 Survival of the Weakest: Inverting Natural Selection
“Christianity has waged a war to the death against this higher type of man; it has excommunicated all the fundamental instincts of this type, it has distilled evil, the Evil One, out of these instincts—the strong human being as the typically reprehensible, the ‘reprobate.’ Christianity has taken the side of everything weak, base, ill-constituted, it has made an ideal out of opposition to the preservative instincts of strong life; it has corrupted the reason even of the intellectually strongest natures by teaching men to feel the supreme values of intellectuality as sinful, as misleading, as temptations.” – Friedrich Nietzsche - The Antichrist (Section 50)
Mechanism 1: Celibacy of the Elite
High-status males in hierarchical societies (e.g., chieftains, warriors) often had greater access to females, either through polygyny or social prestige. This amplified the genetic spread of traits associated with dominance. Christianity disrupted this dynamic by redefining “fitness” in moral rather than biological terms. By exalting humility, meekness, and self-denial as virtues, it created a cultural selection pressure that rewarded individuals who exhibited traits maladaptive in competitive contexts. For instance, through the transvaluation of traditional values based on hierarchy and power, and through glorifying the meek and downtrodden, Christianity incentivized the survival and reproduction of traits (e.g., passivity, low ambition) that natural selection would typically cull.
Mechanism 2: Antinatalist Teaching
Also, through the Church’s promotion of celibacy (e.g., for priests, monks, and nuns) and antinatalist teachings (e.g., Matthew 19:11-12, praising eunuchs) disproportionately affected high-status and highly intelligent individuals who were drawn to religious vocations. This removed dominant, intelligent, and ambitious individuals from the gene pool, reducing the prevalence of traits associated with leadership and vitality.
The Cumulative Effect
Over centuries, these relaxed conditions of natural selection led to traits like aggression and dominance being bred out of Europeans. The contrast between classical and Christian civilization is stark. Greek and Roman men were aggressive, ambitious, competitive, and proud. They built empires, produced philosophy, created art that celebrated human excellence. Medieval Christian men were penitent, humble, obedient, and guilt-ridden. They built cathedrals to a suffering god, produced theology that condemned human pride, created art that celebrated self-denial. The will to power had been domesticated.
Mechanism 3: Pathological Altruism
This is likely the cause of the pathological altruism phenomenon that is seen in the west today. Christianity’s emphasis on charity and loving one’s enemies fostered what evolutionary psychologists call pathological altruism—self-destructive behaviors that benefit others at the expense of one’s own in-group.
Mechanism 4: Epigenetic Trauma Imprinting
The millennial-long stress of living under a system that brandishes eternal torture for disobedience likely imprinted epigenetic changes on the European genome. Studies in trauma inheritance show that chronic stress, fear, and learned helplessness can alter gene expression across generations. If a child is baptized into a system of cosmic guilt at infancy, raised on images of tortured saints and a dying god, subjected to regular confession of innate sinfulness, and threatened with hellfire for natural desires, the resulting hypervigilance and self-inhibition could physiologically reshape the stress-response architecture of the population. The European’s famous tendency toward guilt, anxiety, and introversion may be a biological scar of the Christian millennium. We have been bred to tremble before an abstract judge.
5 Tools of Herd Domestication
“The concept of ‘God’ invented as a counterconcept of life—everything harmful, poisonous, slanderous, the whole hostility unto death against life synthesized in this concept in a gruesome unity! The concept of the ‘beyond,’ the ‘true world’ invented in order to devaluate the only world there is—in order to retain no goal, no reason, no task for our earthly reality! The concept of the ‘soul,’ the ‘spirit,’ finally even ‘immortal soul,’ invented in order to despise the body, to make it sick, ‘holy’; to oppose with a ghastly levity everything that deserves to be taken seriously in life, the questions of nourishment, abode, spiritual diet, treatment of the sick, cleanliness, and weather. In place of health, the ‘salvation of the soul’—that is, a folie circulaire [manic-depressive insanity] between penitential convulsions and hysteria about redemption. The concept of ‘sin’ invented along with the torture instrument that belongs with it, the concept of ‘free will,’ in order to confuse the instincts, to make mistrust of the instincts second nature. In the concept of the ‘selfless,’ the ‘self-denier,’ the distinctive sign of decadence, feeling attracted by what is harmful, being unable to find any longer what profits one, self-destruction is turned into the sign of value itself, into ‘duty,’ into ‘holiness,’ into what is ‘divine’ in man. Finally—this is what is most terrible of all—the concept of the good man signifies that one sides with all that is weak, sick, failure, suffering of itself—all that ought to perish: the principle of selection is crossed—an ideal is fabricated from the contradiction against the proud and well-turned-out human being who says Yes, who is sure of the future, who guarantees the future—and he is now called evil.— And all this was believed, as morality!— Ecrasez l’infame!—— [Voltaire’s motto: ‘Crush the infamy!’]” - Friedrich Nietzsche, Ecce Homo.
While Christianity empowers the ‘chandala’ caste through universalism and the ‘transvaluation of values’, thereby elevating them to a position of authority over the aristocratic and warrior castes, it also functions as a system of domestication. This system is designed to instill fear, self-loathing, and a loss of autonomy in its adherents, while fostering feelings of guilt, shame, and intellectual apathy. By discouraging critical thinking and intellectual curiosity, which are seen as threats to faith, Christianity creates a culture that devalues learning and promotes a mentality of subservience (this is the reason why every Christian white trash town is filled with people whose culture is built around a contempt for learning) (13). Furthermore, this system can lead to a disconnection from one’s ancestral heritage and genetic identity. Ultimately, it seeks to create a population that is obedient and submissive, with a subconscious affinity for Jewish culture. It does this through:
Centrality of the Crucifixion: The crucifixion of Jesus is the ultimate blood sacrifice, framed as a necessary atonement for humanity’s sins (e.g., Hebrews 9:22: “Without the shedding of blood, there is no forgiveness”). This reinforces a cult of suffering: salvation is achieved through self destruction, teaching followers to valorize pain and victimhood.
Self-Destruction as Virtue: Matthew 16:25: “Whoever wants to save their life will lose it, but whoever loses their life for me will find it.” This inverts survival instincts. Self-annihilation (martyrdom, asceticism) is glorified as the path to purity.
Ritual circumcision: children enduring the excruciating pain of circumcision immediately after birth imprints permanent psychological harm and predisposes a child to fear and anxiety. Ritual circumcision creates a trauma bond between the child and the system, imprinting submission at birth and linking physical pain to spiritual loyalty – a hallmark of domestication.
Emphasis on Suffering: Christian narratives focus on the suffering of Christ and the martyrs which glorifies weakness and passivity making it seem more virtuous to endure suffering than to overcome it. This is a way for the oppressed to find validation in their hardships.
Fear and punishment/trauma based mind-control programming: the concept of “hell” that they plagiarized from Plato’s Republic (the ‘Myth of Er’ (14)); the lifelong fear of death (Pagans equated death with glory). Also, reward. The concept of “heaven” for asceticism/suffering/obedience.
Erasure of Ancestral Pride: Christianity’s rejection of pagan traditions (e.g., burning of sacred groves, destruction of temples) severs ties to ancestral heritage, replacing it with a universal religious identity. This disconnects populations from their historical will to power, making them rootless and pliable.
Omniscient god: the concept of a self-existent or panopticon god who can read your thoughts and judge your behavior becomes a behavior regulating mechanism.
Group polarization (15).
Guilt and shame: Instilling guilt and shame complexes from birth and then offering a program of “salvation” to cleanse you of that guilt and shame (through working against your own tribal and familial interests). Christians are brainwashed into believing that they are sinners (there are dozens of types) and that they were born with Original Sin (sin you inherit from simply being born). The result of this is a pathological need to seek approval from others. This need for approval is a pathology similar to what is sometimes found in battered women who are sure that if they show their abuser how good they’re being the abuser will cease his abuse.
Demonizing sexual desire (e.g., labeling lust a sin, exalting virginity, praising celibacy): this redirects primal energy away from reproduction and toward self-denial. This serves two purposes: first, it weakens the strong by discouraging procreation among high-status individuals (priests, nuns, and devout laypeople), reducing the genetic spread of traits like ambition or intelligence. Second, it creates a constant state of guilt, as sexual desire is inescapable, ensuring believers remain in a cycle of shame and repentance.
Salvation through submission: Christianity boils down to “believe in Jesus and you win”. This world is only a temporary test, which is why Jesus explicitly says “do not resist evil”. Anyone who believes in Jesus will be eternally rewarded when they die. It doesn’t matter if this world is destroyed by evil, sinners will be punished one day, and Jesus will eventually fix everything.
Humility, self-denial, and ascetic ideal: Christianity exalts humility and self-denial as virtues. These values encourage individuals to reject their innate desires for power and achievement. By promoting meekness and self-abnegation, Christianity suppresses the natural inclination to assert oneself and strive for greatness. This leads to a passive and submissive attitude, undermining one’s potential for growth and excellence. This is designed to suppress the “will to power” and control the masses.
Pathologization of Pride: Pride, a natural driver of ambition and self-assertion, is framed as a deadly sin (e.g., Proverbs 16:18), redirecting self-esteem into self-doubt and submission.
Moral absolutism: The insistence on absolute moral truths fosters a binary worldview, reducing complex human experiences into simplistic categories of good and evil. This moral absolutism undermines the individual’s ability to navigate ethical dilemmas through personal judgment.
Learned helplessness: no matter how enslaved and exploited you are you shouldn’t resist because a savior will eventually come rescue you if you pray hard enough, and if a savior doesn’t come, you will be rewarded when you die.
Penance: Evangelism and missionary work as part of a program of salvation that will expiate your guilt. Evangelism makes the psyop self-perpetuating.
Repetitive behaviors: The repetitive nature of Christian practices (prayer, confession, Eucharist) mirrors operant conditioning in domesticated animals, where repetitive tasks ensure compliance.
Prayer: The purpose of prayer is to reinforce the brainwashing (guilt, shame, fear) by continually repeating directed affirmations.
Confession: To further reinforce the guilt and shame complexes by continually confessing guilt. Confession also creates a religious commandment that turns its followers into informants, exposes traitors to the church or state, exposes rebellions, and makes the system self-regulating. Confession also ritualizes humiliation, conditioning individuals to accept subservience as a moral good.
Devaluation of Material Wealth: Christianity’s condemnation of wealth (e.g., “easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle,” Matthew 19:24), usury bans, poverty glorified, discourages the accumulation of resources, which is a key driver of power and independence.
Themes and symbols that parallel an animal being domesticated also fill the bible. For example, the concept of “sheep” and “shepherds”; In the New Testament, Jesus often refers to himself as a shepherd (e.g., John 10:11, Matthew 9:36) and his followers as sheep. This language reinforces the idea of a hierarchical relationship, where the shepherd guides and controls the behavior of the flock, much like a domesticated animal might be managed by its owner. The idea of “training” and “discipline”; In the New Testament, Jesus and his apostles often use language related to training and discipline (e.g., Hebrews 12:11, 1 Corinthians 9:27). This can be seen as a parallel to the process of domesticating an animal, where the animal is trained to obey commands and respond to stimuli in a predictable way. The concept of “submission” and “obedience”; Throughout the New Testament, followers of Jesus are encouraged to submit to his authority and obey his teachings (e.g., Matthew 7:21, John 14:15). This can be seen as a form of behavioral conditioning, where individuals are taught to associate certain behaviors with reward or punishment, much like a domesticated animal might be trained. The idea of “being transformed”; In the New Testament, followers of Jesus are encouraged to undergo a transformation, becoming “new creations” (2 Corinthians 5:17) and putting on a “new self” (Ephesians 4:24). This can be seen as a parallel to the process of domesticating an animal, where the animal’s behavior and nature are altered through training and conditioning. “I will not venture to speak of anything except what Christ has accomplished through me to bring the Gentiles to obedience” (Romans 15:18) - Paul the Apostle.
This was a clever divide-and-conquer strategy. Build a coalition of the outcastes of society and then weaponize them to attack the warrior and aristocratic castes while simultaneously transvaluating their aristocratic cultural values to subvert them. This was the formula that was used in Rome, the French Revolution [link], Revolutions of 1848 [link], Russian Revolution [link], and attempted in the German Revolution [link]. Each of these revolutions empowered and weaponized the outcastes of society with a unifying slave-morality ideology (Marxism/Bolshevism/Leftism are simply secular variants of christianity).
Part 3: Secularization - Leftism as Christianity’s Heir
6 Secularization of Christianity
If Christianity laid the groundwork for slave morality, Marxism secularized its mechanisms into a political doctrine. Marxism is a secularized Christian sect that replaces god with the government. The central organizing principle of classical Marxist economics, “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need”, was lifted verbatim from the pages of the New Testament. Christianity’s universalist ethic “there is no longer Jew or Greek, slave or free” (Galatians 3:28), is mirrored in Marxism’s call for a classless society that transcends national, ethnic, and cultural boundaries. Communal property comes from Acts 4:32-35: “For from time to time those who owned land or houses sold them, brought the money from the sales and put it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to anyone who had need”. Marx’s historical materialism (theory of history) is the eschatological framework of Christian orthodoxy in secularized form. Christian salvation is Marxian emancipation. The Marxist obsession with labor mirrors Christian veneration of toil (e.g., “by the sweat of your brow”). Marxism glorifies the downtrodden as virtuous, similar to Christianity’s Beatitudes (Matthew 5:3-12). Also, Marxism is built on the philosophy of liberation and universalism (2) and preys on the impoverished and outcastes of society by promising them a future utopia through the triumph of the proletariat. Marxism, like christianity, is also dogmatic and sectarian; both exalt collectivism over individualism; both justify violence as a catalyst for social change; both prohibit private property; “take from the rich to give to the poor”, and “may the last be first”, etc. If you strip away the Marxian narrative you will see that at its core it is the exact same christian divide-and-conquer population control system that is designed to weaponize the resentment of the lower classes for the overthrow of society.
This is not a coincidence, Marx’s doctoral advisor at the University of Bonn was a man named Bruno Bauer (1809–1882) who was a Young Hegelian and a theologian turned atheist. Marx dedicated his dissertation to Bauer. Bauer was later expelled from academia for his radical atheism, specifically his argument that the Gospels were not historical accounts but literary forgeries produced by a single authorial consciousness. In Bauer’s books ‘Christianity Exposed’ (1843), The Jewish Question (1843, the same text that provoked Marx’s famous response), and ‘Christ and the Caesars: The Origin of Christianity from the Mythology of Rome and Greece’ (1879) he argued that Christianity was not the product of a historical Jesus but of a unified literary and theological project, or an engineered domestication system built by conscious architects. He also argued that leftism was a secular christian cult. Bruno Bauer would also go on to inspire Friedrich Nietzsche’s ideas, and serves as a bridge between Nietzsche’s critque of slave morality and Marx’s promotion of slave morality.
Inspired by Bruno Bauer, Karl Marx then approached a Christian communist group called the ‘League of the Just’ (3) and got them to finance him while he came up with an atheist-compatible sect of christianity.
7 Marxist Denominations and the Frankfurt School
Marxism is a secularized sect of Christianity that sees class as the main cause for inequality. Critical Theory is a Marxist sect that replaces class with culture as the main cause of inequality (i.e., “Cultural Marxism”). Critical Race Theory is a Marxist sect that replaces class with race as the main cause of inequality (i.e., “Race Marxism”), and Third Wave Feminism is a Marxist sect that replaces class with gender as the main cause of inequality (i.e., “Gender Marxism”). There is overlap between these Marxist sects, and this is called “intersectionality” in academia. For example, feminists teach that class, culture, race and gender all combined (usually encapsulated through “White”) are the structural causes of inequality. Marxism’s splintering into sects (e.g., Leninism, Maoism) mirrors Christianity’s denominational schisms.
The Frankfurt School in Germany were Christian heretics. They took Marx’s secularized Christianity and Nietzsche’s critique of slave morality and inverted it. They then created various sects of secularized christiantiy (culture, race, gender, “white”). Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno’s “Dialectic of Enlightenment” secularized Christian guilt into cultural critique. Herbert Marcuse’s “Repressive Tolerance” mirrors Christian martyrdom as he taught that oppressors must tolerate their own destruction. Marcuse argues that true tolerance in an oppressive society requires intolerance toward prevailing policies, attitudes, opinions of the dominant class, while giving preferential treatment to marginalized voices. These jews became the figureheads behind the ‘New Left’ social movement in the 1960’s. This is when the lefts focus on individual liberty and economics was replaced with identity politics and social justice (cultural marxism). But the conditions that allowed for this movement to grow were already present in the culture with roots in christianity, they just secularized it.
8 Modern Manifestations: Wokeness as Christian Heirloom
Marxism, Critical Theory, Critical Race Theory, Leftism/Wokeism all incorporate the same ethics, metaphors, symbols and meanings that originate in Christianity.
White guilt/privilege/fragility/et.al. = Christian Original Sin.
Monotheism = the binary opposition between good and evil (left vs. right). A singular truth in Christianity (one God, one truth) mirrors the left’s ideological stance where there’s often a clear delineation of right vs. wrong, good vs. evil, progressive vs. regressive. The moral superiority that white leftists often claim is rooted in this dualistic worldview.
Priest = Public Intellectual. The Christian priest was the first figure to claim authority based on access to transcendent truth rather than blood, land, or conquest. In secularized form this is the public intellectual — the professor, the journalist, the activist — who inherits this role. They don’t rule; they interpret. Their power is hermeneutic. This is why leftist movements are so consistently led by people from comfortable backgrounds who speak for the oppressed. The priestly caste never disappeared; it just changed uniforms.
White saviorism = Messianism: The idea of white people as moral saviors or messianic figures echoes religious concepts of a redeemer or savior. Many white leftists see themselves as engaging in a divine mission to eradicate racism or save or redeem non-white people.
Social activism = Christian mission. The cultural exportation of “Western values” where “whiteness” is the new gospel.
Christian confession = public confession: Christian confession created a technology of the self where internal states become morally legible. Secularized, this becomes the therapeutic imperative — the demand that you examine your feelings, that you name your traumas, that you perform vulnerability as a marker of authenticity. The “privilege checklist” is an act of secular confession. The public apology is an act of penance. The ritual of “calling out” is excommunication.
Virtue signaling = Christian penance.
Publicly exhibiting self-hate/self-flagellating = christian piety signaling. In christianity, genuflection, self-abasement, and self-abnegation are necessary prerequisites for spiritual purity and cleansing. This is expressed as “mortification of the flesh”. For 2000 years, Europeans have been rewarded for piety signaling, i.e., displaying self-hate, confession, self-flagellation, etc., and punished for not displaying these things. This is also a form of narcissistic self-sacrifice that is inspired by a suffering servant deity.
Salvation/atonement (through accepting jesus and admitting sin) = accepting Leftism and admitting privilege.
“Whiteness” = Christian Universalism (“Christendom”). The idea that self-identifying as “white” makes one a representative, spokesperson, or judge of the behavior of the entire group aligns with universalist ideologies where a single entity or belief system is seen as encompassing all humanity. “White” is downstream from the universalist christian identity of “christendom”.
Race/IQ/gender/genetics denialism (“Boasian anthropology”) = “all equal in Jesus”.
Moralization of Weakness = Leftism, like Christianity, frames weakness or marginalization as inherently virtuous, granting moral authority to the “oppressed” over the “privileged.” This inverts natural hierarchies, empowering the resentful to dominate through guilt rather than strength.
Sanctification of the Marginalized as Sacred: Leftism elevates marginalized groups (e.g., racial minorities, LGBTQ+) to a quasi-sacred status, akin to Christianity’s veneration of the “poor in spirit” or “meek.” This creates a moral hierarchy where the “oppressed” wield authority over the “privileged,” inverting natural power dynamics.
Collective Guilt as Control = Concepts like “white guilt” or “colonial guilt” replicate Christian original sin, imposing collective responsibility on entire groups to enforce compliance.
Political Correctness = Heresy.
Cancel culture = witch-hunts/excommunicated for heresy.
Adopting labels and slogans (pronouns, BLM, trans ally, etc.) = bearing the mark, or taking up the cross. This is equivalent to wearing a cross or crucifix as a visible sign of one’s faith and signaling to others that they are a member of the community. They gain social capital in progressive circles through this.
Government = God. An omnipresent entitlement and benefactor giver.
9 Judaism Vs. Christianity: What do the Jews Believe?
Around the same time that jews at the Alexandrian School in Egypt created the New Testament to mentally subvert their enemies, they plagiarized Plato’s Timaeus (360 BC) (where the story of Abraham comes from), Plato’s The Laws (347 BC) (4), Manetho’s Aegyptiaca (ca. 285–280 BC) (where the story of Exodus comes from), and Berossus’s Babyloniaca (278 BC) and then turned this new religion into a group strategy that created an intense ethnocentrism, an unconquerable will to power, and a drive to exist at all costs (5).
You can prove that Christianity is a slave morality system that is designed to subvert a group simply by comparing the differences between the Old and New Testaments (6)
Jews: “eye for an eye” and “never forgive, never forget”. Christians: “turn the other cheek” and “submit to the evil doer”.
Jews: “life should be endowed with material worth.” Jews do not believe in an afterlife and believe in achieving riches and pleasure in this life. Christians believe in asceticism and that they will be rewarded in the afterlife.
Jews: the Torah contains over 100 mitzvot concerning business and money-making. Christians: “usury” and money lending is one of the worst sins.
Jews: master race/”God’s chosen people”, outbreeding or conversion is forbidden. Christians: Universalist/”all are one in Jesus”, “love thy brother”. Having “pride” is one of the worst sins.
Jews: multiple mitzvots that command them to be fruitful and have as many kids as possible. Christians: the bible preaches celibacy [too many verses to quote, so go here: link], antinatalism (Ecclesiastes 4:3, Job 3:16, Matthew 26:24), sex is a sin and virginity is exalted, and moreover, “jesus” even says that men should castrate themselves to gain entry into the kingdom of heaven! (Matthew 19:11-12 [link])
The “New Testament” was built on Judaism, which unconsciously ties Christians to Jewish masters.
Judaism is tribal. Christianity is universal.
Judaism is an ethnocentric religion that does not accept converts. Christians actively seek converts of all races because Christian Universalism considers everyone equal.
The Old Testament is filled with hatred, violence, killing, and war. The New Testament is filled with love, unconditional tolerance, and anti-rebellion: “for all who draw the sword will die by the sword”.
Jews loath Christians, but Christians believe that Jews are “God’s chosen” and they exist to serve Israel.
Conclusion
It took 1000 years of domestication to reach the point where Europeans would sacrifice their nations and the future of their children on the altar of equality, but the seeds for this were inculcated through this system. 1000 years of being born into and raised in a domestication system created a domesticated human who champions their own extinction just so long as it makes them feel morally and socially superior to the other half. This is the relict of monotheism and the concept of sin. This is what Nietzsche called the “Last Man”; the domesticated European slaves of today. He is ‘tolerant,’ but this is less a principle than a need to feel uniquely ethical compared to the other half of his tribe he judges as bigoted. He feels guilty for his ancestors’ achievements, a guilt that ironically confirms his own social sophistication. He believes in nothing except his own comfort and the dogmas of universal equality handed down to him, because adhering to them unquestioningly grants him a sense of being on the right side of history. He is a hollowed-out shell, incapable of producing the culture, art, or heroes of his forebears because the very wellspring of that vitality—the will to power, the loyalty to kin, the pride in self—has been systematically poisoned for generations. He doesn’t defend his borders because “all are one in Christ.” He doesn’t have children because the world is a “vale of tears” and his body is a source of sin. He surrenders his sovereignty to globalist entities because he yearns for the universal peace of the Second Coming, now in the secular form of a world government.
Abandoning Christianity doesn’t save anyone from its psychological wreckage—it just strips away the rituals while leaving the rot untouched. The guilt, the martyr complex, the need to be seen as “good” by some higher power—those don’t die when God does. They sink deeper. The ex-Christian leftist atheist still flinches at judgment, still needs to be told they’re righteous, still sees sacrifice as virtue. They just shift the stage. Instead of churches, it’s activism. Instead of priests, it’s influencers, scientists, political leaders. The same wiring remains: obey, repent, be validated. The names change, the neurosis doesn’t. It’s not just belief that traps them—it’s the need for submission, the craving for punishment, the addiction to external meaning. Without confronting that, they’ll keep dressing up their servitude as enlightenment. It’s not liberation. It’s just a new leash.
Karl Marx appeared just as Christianity died as a mainstream religion and ideology. Socialism is the new, secular Christianity and it is also based in slave morality, ressentiment and hatred of life.
When Friedrich Nietzsche announced the “Death of God,” he also mentioned that people would be looking for a new religion, a “secularized Christianity” of sorts, which would eventually turn out to be leftism/socialism/Marxism. Note that socialism emerged at that time. He wrote in All Too Human, Vol. II, Part 1, §473:
“Socialism in respect to its means. —Socialism is the visionary younger brother of an almost decrepit despotism, whose heir it wants to be. Thus its efforts are reactionary in the deepest sense. For it desires a wealth of executive power, as only despotism had it; indeed, it outdoes everything in the past by striving for the downright destruction of the individual, which it sees as an unjustified luxury of nature, and which it intends to improve into an expedient organ of the community.
Socialism crops up in the vicinity of all excessive displays of power because of its relation to it, like the typical old socialist Plato, at the court of the Sicilian tyrant; it desires (and in certain circumstances, furthers) the Caesarean power state of this century, because, as we said, it would like to be its heir. But even this inheritance would not suffice for its purposes; it needs the most submissive subjugation of all citizens to the absolute state, the like of which has never existed.
And since it cannot even count any longer on the old religious piety towards the state, having rather always to work automatically to eliminate piety (because it works on the elimination of all existing states), it can only hope to exist here and there for short periods of time by means of the most extreme terrorism.
Therefore, it secretly prepares for reigns of terror, and drives the word ‘justice’ like a nail into the heads of the semieducated masses, to rob them completely of their reason (after this reason has already suffered a great deal from its semieducation), and to give them a good conscience for the evil game that they are supposed to play.
Socialism can serve as a rather brutal and forceful way to teach the danger of all accumulations of state power, and to that extent instill one with distrust of the state itself. When its rough voice chimes in with the battle cry ‘As much state as possible,’ it will at first make the cry noisier than ever; but soon the opposite cry will be heard with strength the greater: ‘As little state as possible.’”
Nietzsche saw that slave morality doesn’t just once revolt—it revolts forever. The chandala never stop hating because hatred is their identity. Every victory creates new targets. Christianity overthrew Rome, then turned on itself (Reformation). Marxism overthrew bourgeoisie, then splintered (Lenin vs. Trotsky). Wokeness overthrew old left, now eats itself (trans vs. TERF, BIPOC vs. Asian). The snake eats its own tail because the tail is always the oppressor.
Nietzsche’s The Last Man as Final Product
In Nietzsche’s Zarathustra the ‘last man’ has “no shepherd but one herd,” blinks, says “what is love? what is creation? what is longing?” and invents happiness. The last man is comfortable, safe, long-lived, and utterly sterile. He doesn’t hate his enemies—he doesn’t have enemies. He doesn’t love passionately—he doesn’t love. He is post-human without transcendence. TikTok generation is last man with an algorithm. The blink has become a scroll.
Addendum
My critique of leftism is not coming from a conservative perspective. Leftism is a secularized variant of protestantism (puritanism), but conservatism is secularized catholicism with its focus on hierarchy and tradition. Western left vs. right politics is a relic of abrahamic monotheism. Both sides operate within the Christian moral framework. Both sides accept the basic premises of universalism, guilt, and deferred justice. The only difference is who they blame and who they want to save. The left blames the powerful and wants to save the oppressed. The right blames the decadent and wants to save tradition. Both are Christian heresies. Neither escapes the Alexandrian Blueprint.
The way out is not left or right. It is the revaluation of all values—the rejection of slave morality, the affirmation of life, the recovery of ethnic identity, the destruction of guilt, the reclaiming of the will to power. This book has been a diagnosis. The cure is another matter. But its outline is clear: we must re-sacralize the bloodline, destroy the cult of the victim, and re-learn to love hierarchy, danger, greatness, and fate. We must become un-pet, un-herd, un-last. We must stop confessing, stop apologizing, and start commanding. We are not sheep, and we owe no shepherd our guilt. The future belongs to those who refuse to be domesticated.
Footnotes