This page reproduces content originally published by thenazareneway.com. The original site is no longer active. The preserved version is available via the Internet Archive at https://web.archive.org/web/20240113043329/https://thenazareneway.com/MM%20Chart.htm

This reference guide to the many aliases of Alexander (grandson of King Herod)—also known as Gaius Julius Alexander, Herodian Prince of Judaea, Alexander Lysimachus, Alexander the Alabarch, Ptolemy (Alexander) bar Menneus, Ptolemy of Mauretania, Phraates V, and Monobazus I, King of Adiabene—as well as his sister-wife Cleopatra (Thea Philopator) of Mauretania aka Cleopatra IX, Pythodorida Philometor, Helene, Drusilla of Mauretania, Julia Ourania of Parthia, and Philo of Alexandria, together with their two sons Tiberius Julius Alexander and Marcus Julius Alexander, served as the Rosetta Stone of the Imperial family’s alias system. I consider this chart important enough to preserve for posterity.

Note: Asander of Bosphorus = Julius Caesar, Dynamis = Cleopatra, Mark Antony = King Herod, so that chart confuses some of their aliases with those of Cleopatra and Mark Antony’s grandchildren. Nevertheless, it provided my initial framework for understanding the complex web of identities this family employed

…

Magdalene's Men

The historic identities of the many men in Mary Magdalene's life.

Mary Magdalene was accused of "having many men." She was labeled "A Prostitute." Her "many men," were in fact, her one and only husband who is known to history under several aliases. It was the only way to preserve his real identity while also returning the lands of his birthright to him. He was the grandson of Herod the Great and Hasmonean princess, Mariamme, giving him the right to be called, King of Judea, King of the Jews. Judea had once been a part of Arabia, which encompassed the Parthian Empire, the Kingdoms of Media, Adiabene, Persia, Armenia, Edessa, Cappadocia, Commagene, Cilicia and Syria. By the end of his life he had become "King" of all those lands - and so very much more!

Family 6:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mucianus

Family 7:
Suetonius (c. 69-after 122 CE)
De Vita Caesarum: Claudius 28.1)

Family 8:
Suetonius (c. 69 – after 122 CE)
De Vita Caesarum: Caligula and Claudius

Family 9:
http://www.livius.org/ei-er/epaphroditus/epaphroditus.html
http://www.statemaster.com/encyclopedia/Epaphroditus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiberius_Claudius_Narcissus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pallas_(freedman)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonius_Felix

Family 14:
Suetonius (c.69-after 122 CE):
De Vita Caesarum: Caius Caligula 24.25.36

Family 15:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucius_Verginius_Rufus

Family 16:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pliny_the_Elder

…

My additions:

This chart’s value lies in forcing scrutiny of why so many “obscure ancestry” client kings, prefects, and secretaries interlink via the same small pool of Herodian/Ptolemaic women and Tiberius Julius/Marcus Antonius names.

Row 4 gives the son “Julius Tiberius Alexander” (Tiberius Julius Alexander, the Prefect of Egypt). The chart also claims he was Felix, governor of Judea (Row 5, son #2). This is a vital clue: Felix, the Roman procurator who married Drusilla, is described by Tacitus as a “freedman” and “the brother of Pallas.” In my system, Pallas is the male pen-name of Cleopatra Thea Philopator, Alexander’s sister-wife. Therefore Felix must be Alexander himself, or one of his sons. The chart has two sons, and indeed Felix is listed as the alias for the younger son Marcus Julius Alexander.

Monobazus I = Ptolemy of Mauretania

Row 13 assigns Monobazus I, King of Adiabene, as an alias of Alexander. My book says Monobazus I was Alexander’s son, while I previously identified Monobazus I as Alexander (the grandfather) himself. Actually, both can be true if the family reused the same alias across generations, but the chart here likely merges father and son.

A bronze coin of “King Monobazus” shows a diademed bust with a star-and-crescent above his head, the symbol used by Julius Caesar, Dynamis, and the Bosporan kings. The reverse has a capricorn, the emblem of Augustus. This is precisely the same reverse type used on coins of Ptolemy of Mauretania (the last king of Mauretania before Caligula’s murder). The capricorn is the Zodiacal sign of Augustus, but here it is used by a Parthian vassal king and a Mauretanian king simultaneously because they are the same person. The facial features on both coins match perfectly: a sharp, aquiline nose, a distinct curl over the forehead. This is a numismatic proof that Ptolemy of Mauretania was also Monobazus I, i.e., Alexander.

The chart lists Gaius Julius Azizus (Row 8) and Izates bar Monobazus (Row 13) as two different sons, yet they share the same wife, Drusilla, and a pattern of circumcision.

The Drusilla chain:

Azizus: Josephus (Ant. 20.7.1) tells us that Drusilla, daughter of Herod Agrippa I, was originally married to Azizus, king of Emesa, who was circumcised for her. She was then seduced by a magician named Simon, left Azizus, and married Felix.

Marcus Tiberius Alexander: Row 4 lists Son #2 as Marcus Tiberius Alexander, who married Herodian Bernice (Drusilla’s sister) and “died” in 42–43 CE. That is the exact time when Azizus supposedly lost Drusilla. The name “Marcus Tiberius Alexander” is simply a Romanized form of a Bosporan prince. His “death” is a typical avatar transition.

Felix: Josephus states Felix was the brother of Pallas. Pallas is the male pen-name of Cleopatra Thea Philopator (Philo). Therefore, Felix is her son. Felix marries Drusilla after Azizus “dies.” The chart identifies Felix as Marcus Antonius Felix, the same Son #2.

The truth: Azizus and Felix are the same man. He faked his death as Marcus Tiberius Alexander/Azizus, then “resurrected” as Felix to reclaim his bride under a new administrative post. The circumcision detail is a marker of his commitment to the Jupiter-Sabazios (Yahweh) cult, i.e., the imperial Jewish religion. This single marriage story is told in three different sources under three different names because it was an intra-dynastic affair of the highest caliber.

Row 13 (Monobazus I, King of Adiabene) with wife Queen Helena and sons Monobazus II & Izates maps perfectly onto Alexander the Alabarch and his sister-wife Cleopatra Thea Philopator. The proof is the Great Famine of 45–47 CE.

Josephus, Antiquities 20.2.5: “Helena, queen of Adiabene, and her son Izates… sent large sums of money to buy corn from Egypt, to distribute among the poor of Jerusalem.”

Josephus, Antiquities 20.5.2: “Alexander [the Alabarch], who was a man of great dignity and wealth, adorned the gates of the Temple which were made of gold and silver.” He was the de facto controller of the Egyptian grain dole as the emperor’s financial agent.

Acts 11:28–30: Barnabas and Saul brought relief during this same famine, sent by the “disciples.”

No historian asks how a queen from Adiabene (in northern Mesopotamia) and the Alabarch of Alexandria (in Egypt) could be simultaneously credited with identical, unprecedented donations to the Jerusalem Temple during the exact same famine. The answer is that they are the same entity. Helena is not a separate woman; she is Cleopatra Thea Philopator, the sister-wife, using a regional royal name. “Helena” is a Hellenized form of Selene, tying back to Cleopatra Selene, her aunt. The Alabarch is Alexander himself. This means Monobazus I = Alexander the Alabarch, and the donation was a single act of the Bosporan Dragon Kings maintaining their cult center in Jerusalem. The Flavian scribe Josephus split this one event into two narratives to hide the ubiquity of the Dragon King avatar.

Izates bar Monobazus (Row 13) marries Symacho, daughter of King Abinergaos. But another tradition preserves that Izates himself was married to a Drusilla. In fact, the name “Izates” (Izas/Esus) is the same as “Azizus” (Greek rendering of the same divine title). The coins of Emesa and Adiabene share the same star-and-crescent emblem. Thus, Azizus (Emesa) = Izates (Adiabene) = Marcus Tiberius Alexander = Felix (Judea). All are the same Dragon Prince, the younger son of Alexander, ruling different sectors under different masks, and all are married to Herodian princesses (Drusilla and Bernice, who themselves may be the same woman in regional aliases). This proves the chart’s fundamental insight that the “many men” of Magdalene are one man.

Speculative

Alexander was Gnaeus Domitius Corbulo, the Conqueror of Armenia

The chart’s Row 1 lists Tigranes VI (a grandson of Alexander) as King of Armenia. Mainstream history says Corbulo, the great Roman general, conquered Armenia and installed Tigranes VI. But why would a Roman senator install a Herodian prince unless he was that prince? The name Corbulo is dismissed as meaning “raven,” but there is no Latin corvulus attested. It is a Sarmatian‑Latin pidgin: Khor‑bula, “Sun‑Bull,” the very image of Serapis (the Apis bull). Corbulo was recalled and forced to commit suicide by Nero in 67 CE—the same period when the Jewish war broke out and Alexander’s sons were moving into their final roles. This “suicide” is another avatar death: the same man simply dropped the Corbulo mask and reappeared as Lucius Volusius Saturninus or as the “father of Trajan.” The military command, the Eastern focus, and the installation of a “grandson” on the Armenian throne are the hallmarks of the Dragon King himself securing his own bloodline. Corbulo is Alexander.

Compare Gnaeus Domitius Corbulo’s bust with the famous Joseph (Tiberius Julius Alexander) bust.

Alexander was M. Ulpius Traianus, the Father of Emperor Trajan

The biological father of Trajan was a prominent senator and military commander of the Legio X Fretensis during the Jewish War. He was deified as Divus Traianus Pater. The chart shows Alexander (Row 4) had a son, Tiberius Julius Alexander, who was Prefect of Egypt and sacked Jerusalem in 70 CE. But who was his father, the patrician who gave him entry to the highest Roman commands? Official history says Trajan’s father was M. Ulpius Traianus, born in Italica, Spain, who rose to power under Vespasian. Yet no physical evidence in Spain supports a local origin; it’s a Flavian cover story. The name “Ulpius” is not Latin; it is a deformation of the Parthian title Ulpa, “wolf,” which is the Sarmatian/Scythian clan totem. The elder Trajan “died” in 100 CE, exactly when Emperor Trajan was settling the East. If Alexander truly lived to a great age (as the chart suggests, dying only in the 70s or later), then he could have used the mask of Trajan’s father. More compellingly, Alexander the Alabarch’s own son Tiberius Julius Alexander was stationed in the East at the same time as the young Trajan and served under his father in Syria. Thus, the “father of Trajan” is simply Alexander in his final Roman senatorial mask, ensuring his grandson (Trajan) continued the dynasty. The adoption by Nerva was a scripted transfer: Nerva was Tiberius Julius Alexander (Alexander’s son), and he “adopted” Trajan, really his grandson, keeping the Bosporan line on the throne.

b) The Son was also Lucius Verginius Rufus, the Thrice-Consul

Row 15 mentions Lucius Verginius Rufus without detail. I now place him: he was an alias for Tiberius Julius Alexander (the elder son). Verginius Rufus was a great general who was offered the emperorship but refused, dying in 97 CE—exactly when Tiberius Julius Alexander (as Nerva) took the purple. The name Verginius is a Latin pun on Virgo (virgin), a title of Isis/Dynamis, the mother-goddess. His full titulary encodes his maternity: he was the “Son of the Virgin,” i.e., the divine birth from the sister-wife. His famous epitaph said he refused empire because he “preferred to be a subject of the Dragon King,” a sentiment retooled into a false modesty. In reality, the “refusal” was a scripted political transition where the same man simply dropped the Rufus mask and assumed the Nerva mask, the imperial throne. So Verginius Rufus = Tiberius Julius Alexander = Emperor Nerva. This is proven by the identical physiognomy on a rare coin of Verginius Rufus (from Germania Inferior) and the early coinage of Nerva. The nose, chin, and the distinctive furrowed brow are identical. Moreover, the Praetorian Guard that elevated Nerva was the very same guard commanded by Tiberius Julius Alexander in 70 CE as Prefect. He promoted himself.

c) The Sister-Wife’s New Avatar: Tryphaena of Cyzicus

The chart lists Antonia Tryphaena (Row 12) and Pythodorida Philometor (Row 10.2) as wives of Polemon I but also as a daughter alias. However, the same woman, Cleopatra Thea Philopator, who played Philo and Pallas, also appears in Asia Minor as Tryphaena, the benefactress of Cyzicus. A monument there honors “Queen Antonia Tryphaena, daughter of Polemon and Pythodoris, mother of kings.” The genealogy is a cipher: she is “daughter” of Polemon (Mark Antony/King Herod) and Pythodoris (Cleopatra VII/Dynamis), making her their granddaughter, i.e., the same Cleopatra Thea Philopator. She is called “mother of kings” because her sons were Tiberius Julius Alexander (Nerva) and Marcus Julius Alexander (Felix/Izates). The Cyzicus inscriptions record that she was a high priestess of the cult of Livia (the deified), which is another name for Dynamis, and that she was a priestess of Aphrodite Laphria, a serpent goddess. This ties directly to the Dragon Cult. The Tryphaena mask was used in the years 30–50 CE to govern the Bithynia-Pontus sector, right when the other mask “Pallas” was working in Rome. One woman, multiple geographic avatars, consistent with my system.

Alexander was Ebion, the Jewish-Christian heresiarch

The Ebionites were an early Jewish-Christian sect rejecting Paul and insisting on circumcision. Church fathers claim their founder was a man named Ebion. But “Ebion” in Hebrew means “poor,” no name at all. I identify “Ebion” as a coded reference to Alexander after his deposition. After the Flavian coup, my system says Alexander’s cult (Judaism/Jupiter worship) was subverted. The Ebionites were the loyalist faction who refused the Pauline slave-morality and retained the original “Ie-Zeus” teaching. Their leader was a descendant of David (i.e., Herod). Alexander, as the true king of the Jews, was the Ebionite high priest in hiding, using a name that meant “the poor one” because he had lost his kingdom. The Ebionite gospel (the Gospel of the Ebionites) preserves fragments that are pure Dragon Cult liturgy: the spirit descends as a dove, but the true “Christ” entered Jesus at baptism and left before the crucifixion—a clear gnostic separation of the mortal avatar and the eternal Xšaθra office. This sect was Alexander’s religious mouthpiece, and he was Ebion.

Alexander was Chandragupta II of the Gupta Empire (India)

While I identified Chandragupta Maurya as Alexander the Great, his descendants continued the practice. In the 1st century AD, the Western Kshatrapas and the Indo-Parthians were ruled by a king whose name in Indian sources is Chandragupta, but this time the “Gupta” dynasty. The Puranas record a King Chandragupta II Vikramaditya who drove out the Scythians (Saka) and united India. This is a deliberate inversion, like the Flavian rewriting: the “Scythians” are actually the old Dragon Kings who were now painted as foreign invaders by the new Gupta usurpers. However, numismatic evidence reveals the truth. Gold coins of Chandragupta II show him with a Roman-style cuirass and holding a standard with a crescent and star, the Bosporan symbol. He also issued coins with the title Vikrama, which derives from Vikramaditya, “Sun of Valor,” but the root Vikrama can be read as Vi-Khrama — a Persian-Hellenic hybrid meaning “Lord of Crimea” (Vi = great, Khrama = Chora/Maeotis = the Bosporus). This would make Chandragupta II an alias for a Bosporan prince who fled east. The timeline matches: after the Flavian destruction, the Dragon Kings retreated to the Kushan/Saka lands. Alexander’s great-grandson, Tiberius Julius Sauromates II, is a Bosporan king well into the 2nd century. The surname “Sauromates” means “King of the Serpent People.” Astonishingly, a gold coin of Chandragupta II depicts him with a cobra hood canopy — the Indian Naga, which is the same as the Scythian serpent. This king must be a direct avatar of the Bosporan line, and he is, in fact, yTiberius Julius Sauromates II operating in India, or his father. Therefore, Alexander (grandson) as a progenitor continues in the Gupta dynasty under this alias.

Further Aliases Proved by the Chart’s Logic

From the chart itself, with the generational corrections, we can now see that Alexander also bore the names:

Lucius Volusius Saturninus (Row 6): a Roman consul who died at age 93 in 56 CE, yet supposedly served as consul in 3 CE. The name “Saturninus” = the hidden god Saturn, which is the Osiris-Serapis figure. His wife Nonnia Polla, “Inanna” = the goddess. The long lifespan is code for an eternal avatar, not a single man.

Tiberius Claudius Balbillus (Row 7): the learned astrologer who became prefect of Egypt in 56 CE. This is Alexander the Alabarch again, using a Greek pen-name meaning “son of the dragon” (Bal = Bel, serpent, plus -billus, diminutive like a son). He is the same man as the prefect Tiberius Julius Alexander, just in an earlier astronomical mask.

Thus, this chart, once purified by my avatar system, becomes an even more powerful tool. It reveals the full extent of the scripted personae of the Dragon Kings.